5 ms·

https://www.spacejam.com/ https://www.spacejam.com/ This whole site from 1996 still works!

51Cards 6y ago
They must be continuing to update this as in 1996 it wouldn't have had links to Privacy Policy pages on WB's current website. I think that makes it even cooler as they are actively maintaining it in its historic form.
- adventured 6y ago
  In the earliest (December) 1996 version that Archive.org has, the site has an initial landing page you have to click through before you arrive at something similar to the homepage today: https://web.archive.org/web/19970124032137/http://www.spacejam.com/index.cgi https://web.archive.org/web/19970124032137/http://www.spacej...
nickthemagicman 6y ago
It's so fast!
dstick 6y ago
Oh man, how our attention span and curiosity has changed. Can you imagine a sitemap like this, today: https://www.spacejam.com/cmp/sitemap.html https://www.spacejam.com/cmp/sitemap.html ? It's glorious!
- piker 6y ago
  Probably a wasted effort back then, too, to be fair.
- jkingsbery 6y ago
  > "Never on the Internet have so few worked so hard to bring you so much in so little time." Gotta love the editorializing right there.
apocalyptic0n3 6y ago
I'm curious if they are going to leave it in its historic form or replace it for the upcoming sequel being released this summer.
- jaredsohn 6y ago
  I was wondering this, too, recently. spacejam2.com is kind of interesting in that they sell jams and also offer to sell the domain for a million dollars. "You are welcome to buy our jam or you can also buy our website"
  - Dragonai 6y ago
    This is hilarious, thanks so much for sharing. Very funny halfway-legitimate approach to cybersquatting.
  - apocalyptic0n3 6y ago
    Thank you for sharing that. That's the most dedicated domain squatter I've ever seen.
htrp 6y ago
https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/space-jam-forever-the-website-that-wouldnt-die-70507/ https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/space-jam-for... There are a group of fans who've kept it up and updated....
city41 6y ago
The Cookie Settings link looks to be incorrect. I was curious what cookie settings would mean on a site from 1996.

They must be continuing to update this as in 1996 it wouldn't have had links to Privacy Policy pages on WB's current website. I think that makes it even cooler as they are actively maintaining it in its historic form.

adventured 6y ago
In the earliest (December) 1996 version that Archive.org has, the site has an initial landing page you have to click through before you arrive at something similar to the homepage today: https://web.archive.org/web/19970124032137/http://www.spacejam.com/index.cgi https://web.archive.org/web/19970124032137/http://www.spacej...

nickthemagicman 6y ago

It's so fast!

dstick 6y ago

Oh man, how our attention span and curiosity has changed. Can you imagine a sitemap like this, today: https://www.spacejam.com/cmp/sitemap.html https://www.spacejam.com/cmp/sitemap.html ? It's glorious!

piker 6y ago
Probably a wasted effort back then, too, to be fair.
jkingsbery 6y ago
> "Never on the Internet have so few worked so hard to bring you so much in so little time." Gotta love the editorializing right there.

apocalyptic0n3 6y ago

I'm curious if they are going to leave it in its historic form or replace it for the upcoming sequel being released this summer.

jaredsohn 6y ago
I was wondering this, too, recently. spacejam2.com is kind of interesting in that they sell jams and also offer to sell the domain for a million dollars. "You are welcome to buy our jam or you can also buy our website"
- Dragonai 6y ago
  This is hilarious, thanks so much for sharing. Very funny halfway-legitimate approach to cybersquatting.
- apocalyptic0n3 6y ago
  Thank you for sharing that. That's the most dedicated domain squatter I've ever seen.

htrp 6y ago

https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/space-jam-forever-the-website-that-wouldnt-die-70507/ https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/space-jam-for... There are a group of fans who've kept it up and updated....

city41 6y ago

The Cookie Settings link looks to be incorrect. I was curious what cookie settings would mean on a site from 1996.