4 ms·
There are a few alternatives, actually. There is also Element (based on Matrix), and XMPP which use encryption based on the Signal Protocol. Both are mentioned
by kitkat_new 6y ago
There are a few alternatives, actually.
There is also Element (based on Matrix), and XMPP which use encryption based on the Signal Protocol. Both are mentioned in the article.
And yes: users are locked in, because your whole social network is expected to be on WhatsApp.
1) you need to convince others to find you on alternatives (every single person even people you just met, you have to explain what&why; also: workplace, clubs, etc. or leave them). You certainly aren't going to convince everyone
2) you will miss out on a lot: people are being invited into groups, but they can't invite you anymore to just join; people create groups on the messenger they use most often, because it is more convenient for them.
In summary, if you have a active social life and grow/grew up with it you will have a lot of friction if you really want to get rid of it. That is what I would call locked in.
- amelius 6y agoBy the way, this whole problem of network-effect based lock-in was already solved for telephony in the old days. Why do we have to solve it again?
- kiwidrew 6y agoBecause regulation is bad and therefore we have been left at the mercy of the invisible hand of the free market. Even this recent spate of "deplatforming" events can't seem to sway (a certain subset of) the tech community towards the idea that some amount of regulation can be a good thing.
- amelius 6y agoYou mean regulation as in net neutrality?