2 ms·
>Some things will be blurry, but no worse than having the compositor do it. Other things will not be blurry, and that's a huge huge benefit. This is the same t
by cycloptic 6y ago
>Some things will be blurry, but no worse than having the compositor do it. Other things will not be blurry, and that's a huge huge benefit.
This is the same trade-off as you would get without it.
The precision isn't an issue, the error build-up is with rounding and it becomes particularly problematic when you have subsurfaces.
As I have said in another sibling comment, if you don't want the compositor to do any scaling, then don't enable scaling in the compositor.
- Dylan16807 6y ago> This is the same trade-off as you would get without it. Using the compositor method makes everything blurry. It's not the same trade-off. > then don't enable scaling in the compositor. Turning up the font size as you suggested is not at all a proper solution. I want to pass fractional scaling on to the program whenever possible. If it can't handle it, then 2x followed by shrinking can be the fallback.