4 ms·
Or you could just use Dokku [0]? I don't mean to criticise the author's stack but if you just really want to focus on your application and spend less time figur
by wilsonfiifi 6y ago
Or you could just use Dokku [0]? I don't mean to criticise the author's stack but if you just really want to focus on your application and spend less time figuring/learning about deployment then just adopt the 12 factor [1] approach and use Dokku with Fabric[2] for you server setup. I have a sample fabfile [3] I use for my initial server setup that I can easily modify to suit different project needs.
Ultimately, it comes down to personal preferences but Dokku being installable on your development machine (via virtualbox) you've got a very similar environment to production.
[0] https://github.com/dokku/dokku
[1] https://12factor.net/
[2] http://www.fabfile.org/
[3] https://github.com/johnwilson/django-wagtail-template/blob/master/fabfile.py
- e12e 6y agoYou probably want your references without leading spaces, just add another line feed to get them on separate lines and avoid the "code block" that doesn't parse links: [0] https://github.com/dokku/dokku https://github.com/dokku/dokku [1] https://12factor.net/ https://12factor.net/ [2] http://www.fabfile.org/ http://www.fabfile.org/ [3] https://github.com/johnwilson/django-wagtail-template/blob/master/fabfile.py https://github.com/johnwilson/django-wagtail-template/blob/m...
- simplecto 6y agoOP here: I already tried the Dokku way of things, and it was not to my taste. I like being a bit closer to the native docker commands if/when things go sideways. Dokku is an abstraction I don't want.