3 ms·
Yep. But, without the boss providing the capital with which labor can provide that wealth, there isn't much wealth to begin with, which makes that a dubious cri
by shrimp_emoji 6y ago
Yep. But, without the boss providing the capital with which labor can provide that wealth, there isn't much wealth to begin with, which makes that a dubious critique of capitalism, when there are way better ones (or at least ones of unsocialized, "Après moi, le déluge", American capitalism).
- necovek 6y agoFrom my reading, GP comment was not critiquing capitalism, but the statement about where wealth resulting from the labour ends up. And you start off with agreeing to it, so it's even more perplexing why do you see it as a critique?