5 ms·
Gotta say I agree, after hearing non crap news for a year. It's nice to see a hedge fund eat their hat.
by gonzo41 6y ago
Gotta say I agree, after hearing non crap news for a year. It's nice to see a hedge fund eat their hat.
- swader999 6y agoUntil it cascades like Lehman and AIG with USA citizens holding the bag. In two days we are 33,333 days since the crash of 1929.
- danhak 6y agoThis is nothing like the size of the bubble (US housing market) that precipitated those crashes.
- swader999 6y agoIt is actually. The housing market had real collateral even if it was overly appraised.
- danhak 6y agoNo, it's not. Not even close. The current market cap of GME is $25 billion. Meanwhile, the size of the subprime mortgage market in 2008 was in the neighborhood of $50 trillion.
- swader999 6y agoShorting losses can be infinite. Then add in the derivatives at play. Who backs these trades? Who backs them? What gets triggered when any of these default on their contracts?
- carlmr 6y agoThe bubble may become more visible if a chain reaction is started.
- josephorjoe 6y agoIf that is possible here, there needs to be more regulation on hedge funds so they do not operate in a "heads I win, tails the US govt. bails me out" scenario.
- h_anna_h 6y agoThe solution is simple, do not bail them out.
- throwaway838nq 6y agoThat's the most hilarious part of it. It's a given that someone is going bankrupt big time and someone is going to want to be made whole. They will threaten the stock market until the USG bails them out.
- peterwoerner 6y agohttps://twitter.com/PigeonsK/status/1354824493982773249 https://twitter.com/PigeonsK/status/1354824493982773249 Argument for cascading.
- heartbreak 6y agoThe assumptions in that 4chan screenshot are putting in a lot of work.
- swader999 6y agoWho backs each party isn't that hard to verify. The only assumption is the copy cat trading of Melvin's strategy which seems fairly safe to make.
- heartbreak 6y agoWell, one assumption is that the exposure is actually a meaningful number to an investment bank.
- adamcstephens 6y agoCascading already happened last March and the Fed bailed out the market. That backstopping has clearly helped buoy the market to new highs, while the real economy is contracting. Something like this could trigger a cascade, but that cascade would rest solely on the people who built this bubble.
- PragmaticPulp 6y agoI think the sentiment will shift when people realize that some of these hedge funds invested people's pension money, or university endowments, or any other number of people's funds. WSB has promoted a cartoonish version of Wall Street where hedge funds only hold rich, evil people's money. That's not really how this works. A lot of people are also going to be disappointed to learn that some Wall Street firms profited massively from this situation. And finally, a lot of retail investors who were late to the party are going to lose a lot of money on this. Some of that will flow to early Redditors who got their exit timing right. Some of that will flow to hedge funds who cleverly scooped up the naive money in the chaos. I'd go so far as to bet that journalists are already working on articles with all of these angles. They'll start to trickle out just as soon as the market euphoria wanes.
- pg_bot 6y ago"Pensions and university endowments" are the "women and children" of the financial world. Everyone constantly harps on these classes of people in order to play to your emotions instead of thinking logically. The great thing about America is we allow you to make "stupid" choices. No one should care if you lose all your money by acting stupidly, doesn't matter if you're Harvard or a heroin addict. If you rely on a pension or university endowment for funding you should take up a greater interest in where that money is being invested.
- moolcool 6y agoI hate this sentiment so much. As if it's a bad thing that Wall Street gangster hedge funds are finally feeling the squeeze that they put on everyday working people, just because some of the money they control is pension money or university endowments. It's literally the same rationale people use to justify staying in abusive relationships. Controlling some crumbs of the great unwashed's money gives these billionaires zero moral authority to do the crap they get away with every single day. Fuck them, then fuck them again. They deserve every ounce of this and then some.
- PragmaticPulp 6y ago> As if it's a bad thing that Wall Street gangster hedge funds are finally feeling the squeeze It's categorically false to suggest that Wall Street hedge funds are all suffering from this. Some of them are making massive amounts of money on this situation. Some of that money comes at the expense of casual investors. This idea that Redditors are siphoning money out of hedge funds is just not true for the last round of GME investors. In fact, those latest investors will probably end up funneling their losses right into hedge funds who short this on the way back down.
- ghaff 6y agoThe financial institutions will be fine. Meanwhile some unsophisticated investors who saw this as the financial opportunity of a lifetime will lose their shirts and their homes.