2 ms·

They were also caught discriminating against... well, you can probably finish this sentence. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-santanderbank-mortgages-idUSKBN

• matkoniecz 6y ago
  > It also refused loans to 30 percent of low-income applicants, compared to the aggregate rate of 18 percent Why refusing to loan money to low-income borrowers is supposed to be discrimination? If someone has minimal income they are far less likely to repay loan, why this is supposed to be indicator of some discrimination? If someone earn 30k per year and someone earns 3000k per year then it is not surprising that loan of 200k would be far more likely given to person with higher income. Banks are typically extremely awful, but why that specific part is supposed be indicator of something wrong? And it seems likely that other statistics mentioned are result of that.
  • bsanr2 6y ago
    They were doing it significsntly more than their competitors.