3 ms·
And when you do those things, they will be shutdown. Bye bye Parlor.
by virmundi 6y ago
And when you do those things, they will be shutdown. Bye bye Parlor.
- morlockabove 6y agoBro just build your own AWS
- jonathankoren 6y agoBro. You don’t need AWS. You need a server. People did this. For decades.
- cambalache 6y agoUntil your internet provide cuts you off
- jonathankoren 6y agoYeah, it’s a real shame that’s there is only one ISP in the whole world. If there was at least one more, maybe Pirate Bay wouldn’t have been killed in 2006.
- morlockabove 6y agoDepending on where you live, there might only be one.
- llampx 6y agoYou need Cloudflare though. And where are you going to host the server?
- jonathankoren 6y agoEvery site uses Cloudflare, and there’s only one ISP in the entire world? That’s CrAzY! Seriously. The lack of imagination here is embarrassing. Cargo cult engineering. I suggest you read up on what a real persecuted site does. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-ingenious-way-the-pirate-bay-avoids-the-police-2014-9 https://www.businessinsider.com/the-ingenious-way-the-pirate...
- andrewflnr 6y agoOr, like, don't build on AWS. Last I heard Gab is still up because they run their own servers
- jb775 6y agoFYI by your own logic, you have no right to be upset about the RobinHood GME situation. Per your own logic, RobinHood is a private company, and they can do whatever they want...If you don't like it, you can build your own RobinHood!
- lindenksv85 6y agoRH is subject to a ton of federal regulations that social media isn’t. They legally cannot cut off one set off investors in order to enrich another. It’s a felony. We are not discussing free speech here.
- SkyBelow 6y agoIt is kinda funny how the Constitutionally protected right doesn't have laws ensuring fair treatment, but stock trading does. Why should they have to allow for equal access to investors? Sure, the law currently requires it, but if we made a law saying First Amendment now applies to all private businesses people would be fine with it because it is now the law? I think not. So, given they are a private company, shouldn't they be free to do business with who they want and how they want? As for the penalty of breaking the law, if it is enforced it will likely still have been the cheaper option for those who made the call.