6 ms·
WSB Went Private on Reddit
- leesalminen 6y agoPrivate or deleted?
- vincentmarle 6y agoWSB is now also offline on Discord. Does this have anything to do with SEC / Biden administration "monitoring the situation"?
- asenna 6y agoDiscord claims it's not related to GME but rather because of the language that WallstreetBets community uses. > Today, we decided to remove the server and its owner from Discord for continuing to allow hateful and discriminatory content after repeated warnings. > To be clear, we did not ban this server due to financial fraud related to GameStop or other stocks. https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/27/22253251/discord-bans-the-r-wallstreetbets-server https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/27/22253251/discord-bans-the...
- throwaway0a5e 6y agoI hope for Discord's sake that the "language that WallstreetBets community uses" that they take issue with isn't "calling each other autists as a form of endearment" because if that's the case there's going to be a really tough follow up question about a different group of people's language.
- ignoranceprior 6y ago> really tough follow up question about a different group of people's language What are you insinuating?
- jborden13 6y agoThink they landed on the moon...
- root_axis 6y agoAlso banned from discord.
- 0_gravitas 6y agoNow that's interesting, makes me see discord in a bit of a poorer light to be honest.
- fwiwm2c 6y agoThis happens frequently. Happened last week too. Mostly to remove bots/shills. Will likely come back soon.
- konjin 6y agoA good time to shill for the open source, distributed reddit alternative: https://getaether.net/ https://getaether.net/
- MitPitt 6y agoDoesn't look like reddit at all, but maybe i'm wrong. I would suggest Lemmy, much more similar: https://join.lemmy.ml/ https://join.lemmy.ml/
- flerchin 6y agoI guess it was cheaper to buy reddit than cover the positions. :-D
- bedobi 6y agoMost of my GME units were purchased at ~$100. But I like the stock! So today I bought more at $330. I'm not worried that the aftermarket nominal price is just below that, because I think that's just fake short ladder figures on very low volume - I'm still HOLDING - when the short sellers are truly forced to buy back to cover their shorts the price will go to the moon. The real squeeze hasn't even begun yet.
- gnfargbl 6y ago...I honestly can't tell whether this is meant to be a serious post, or a parody of a typical WSB post about GME.
- adenadel 6y agoWouldn't shock me if it were both
- UncleMeat 6y agoYeah I'm not sure I've ever felt as old as I feel today. I just don't get it.
- bedobi 6y agohere's my understanding (which may be wrong, and this isn't financial advice or a recommendation) if the stock is at $20 and you think it will go to $10 you can sell the stock at $20 (even if you actually don't own the stock, and never actually gave the buyer the stock, it's more like a promise that you will deliver the stock at some point) so now you've pocketed $20 and you're waiting for the stock to go down to $10 then, you can buy it for $10 and deliver the stock since you got paid $20, but you only paid $10 for the stock, you've made $10 this is called shorting people have been shorting to the point the number of stocks that are promised to be delivered is 140% of the actual number of stocks this means that, when those who promised to deliver stocks are actually called in to deliver the stocks they already sold for $20 (or whatever price they shorted at) they need to buy up 140% of the stocks in existence needless to say, there are not enough stocks to enable them to cover their shorts and this creates an insane spiral positive feedback loop in the price none of it has anything to do with fundamentals of the business, their dividends, balance sheets etc it's purely an artifact of a quirk state the stock has gotten into the funny thing is it's dumb retail investors who spotted it and kind of all jumped on in at the same time we like the stock! if and when the shorters are truly called in on their promises to deliver the stocks they shorted they will have to fight over an extremely limited supply of stocks, due to the nature of them having sold 140% of the stocks in existence AND us retail investors who have vacuumed up what little was for sale anyway (only a fraction of all stocks in existence are ever up for sale in the first place, so think of it like us vacuuming them all up and leaving them in a position where they have to deliver 140% of the stocks in existence when only a few percent of them are for sale = lol
- liquidify 6y agoHopefully they don't stay this way. It is pretty annoying when subs disappear or get the cancel culture. Too many good ones have already disappeared.
- asenna 6y agoInteresting thing is you can see the direct affect that WSB has in the aftermarket. It fell off a cliff around the time the subreddit went private. But yeah tomorrow is going to be fun to follow this, when the real squeeze kicks in.
- cvhashim 6y agoOof, this should be interesting.
- andrethegiant 6y agoAppend a 2
- mastre_ 6y agoWe are experiencing technical difficulties based on unprecedented scale as a result of the newfound interest in WSB. We are unable to ensure Reddit's content policy and the WSB rules are enforceable without a technology platform that can support automation of this enforcement. WSB will be back.
- fwiwm2c 6y agoSo sad. Obviously reddit asked them to keep in check and reddit itself doesn't have technology to help WSB moderate itself. Just one more example why decentralization is actually the future of all content/social platforms. Centralization of control just reinforces existing control/choke points trying to keep entrenched in power in the name of guidelines.
- konjin 6y agoA good time to shill for the open source, distributed reddit alternative: https://getaether.net/ https://getaether.net/ It even includes mining for new posts which is a simple yet surprisingly effective way to limit people's willingness to sock puppet.
- djeiasbsbo 6y agoI saw this coming from a mile away because the way these threads were used was entirely new. Essentially, threads were used more like live chats where people reacted to the stock price. Everytime a thread hit the 100k comment limit, they had to create a new one. Due to the activity, the threads were also constantly at the top of the reddit frontpage.
- mastre_ 6y ago> Just one more example why decentralization is actually the future of all content/social platforms. Truly. In this case it remains to be seen if they can get back online, apparently it's happened before.
- twostorytower 6y ago> We are experiencing technical difficulties based on unprecedented scale as a result of the newfound interest in WSB. We are unable to ensure Reddit's content policy and the WSB rules are enforceable without a technology platform that can support automation of this enforcement. WSB will be back. If they don't come back before market open $GME, $AMC, $BB all go caput tomorrow. The community will panic sell without a place to unify.
- gremlinsinc 6y agoNah, /r/wallstreetbetsnew is already up and organizing as a backup. I'm sure some of the mods are probably thinking about taking their sub the fediverse... this is definitely a sub ripe for breaking out of reddit into it's own thing...
- riffic 6y agoOther subreddits have done the same thing. Look at Lemmy: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy
- gremlinsinc 6y agoYeah, I've seen that. I feel like there's something better coming though. I feel like something's missing from activepub/federation. I don't know if it's something to make censorship harder, or make privacy better, or for better identity. Something though is missing. Maybe there needs to be a centralized "identity" and accounts can be "verified" like on twitter and you'd use @user instead of @user@server.com This way you also could have less chance of impersonation. That's something that I really wonder about... I mean Obama could have an account on one site, and I could create an account with same name on another server masquerading as him, and who'd know which one's authentic? Sure, if you don't care about celebrity insights that's great, but celebs actually do reply on twitter and that's one of the "draws" being able to possibly interact with someone famous who could make you "famous for a minute".
- 6y ago
- vthallam 6y agoFor the curious, I made a leaderboard based off r/wallstreetbets comments from the last 24h - https://stonks.news/wsb/summary/ https://stonks.news/wsb/summary/
- antisthenes 6y agoAre you sure that for example "PUMP" is a stock that WSB is talking about, rather than using the word pump in reference to other stocks?
- vthallam 6y agoThere are few words that closely align with common WSB terminology. I filtered most of them, will add it to the list.
- Lorin 6y agoAdd a timescale filter :)
- djeiasbsbo 6y agoThis was my first and last "gambling session" with stocks. Bought in at 70 and sold at 380. Really glad that I got lucky for once but I'm never gonna do that again!
- dang 6y agoFor pointers to the other interesting vertices of this story graph, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25933543 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25933543. Edit: is the current submission a dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25868680 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25868680? Sounds like the same story but 5 days was a long time ago.
- lemoncookiechip 6y agor/WSB is gathering here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW1GR7BECq4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW1GR7BECq4 Hold
- lurkmurk 6y agoAnother sad day for internet communities. Big guys always win. If you want freedom to express, self host (let's see how long until this is forbiden).
- asenna 6y agoOr perhaps we create and start promoting decentralized options? It's still early days but I was recently looking into decentralized web-hosting through IPFS / ENS and it's definitely maturing. I think we'll be seeing more decentralized services in the next year or two.
- gher-shyu3i 6y agoThis is good for Bitcoin? :P
- Threeve303 6y agoOver the past decade or so we have seen the increasing power of social media that can manipulate numerous people into behaving a certain way for a certain outcome. Just look at the last four years... Would it be possible to target specific financial institutions in the market to cause volatility and or a crash? A sort of social media driven financial weapon.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- danhor 6y agoIt's now back again
- asenna 6y agoLooks like WSB is back. Mods took it private to probably do some bot-cleansing and to figure some things out given the sub is 3.6 million strong now, and the growth just in the past week is insane. They definitely feel let down with what Discord has done though and seeking help from the community. https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6j4r9/where_do_we_go_from_here_and_who_is_going_to_step/ https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6j4r9/wher...