4 ms·
One of the authors here. The idea (if we were to actually implement this in our product) would be to give the user some "boilerplate". We're no where near being
by mritchie712 6y ago
One of the authors here. The idea (if we were to actually implement this in our product) would be to give the user some "boilerplate". We're no where near being able to automate a 100 line `SELECT` statement with CTE's etc., but it does a decent job of starting you off.
- minimaxir 6y agoGranted, you could also get similar boilerplate from Googling your query and checking the top answer on Stack Overflow. That's free, and includes discussions on constraints/optimization.
- mritchie712 6y agoYeah, we originally thought GPT could accept a large domain specific training set (e.g. feed in the SQL schema for a user), but it's not there yet. A PM at OpenAI said it shouldn't be long off though. When that's possible, the SQL generated should be much better than Google.
- MauranKilom 6y ago> but it's not there yet. A PM at OpenAI said it shouldn't be long off though. Does this mean that the model is still being improved? Or just that your access to it will somehow become better? Either way, I'm curious what that entails.
- mkgm1 6y agoThe OpenAI GPT-3 API access policy talks about how you grant them the right to use anything you feed the API to improve it, so I assume they're doing some kind of continuous retraining
- mritchie712 6y ago> Does this mean that the model is still being improved? Yes > Or just that your access to it will somehow become better? Yes Increasing the amount of training data we can send would improve our results and that's what OpenAI mentioned they're working on.