3 ms·
> The other didn't, didn't, and doesn't. That French test was of physical controls, not subtle customs coding like the wine example. It's like the difference
by dingaling 6y ago
> The other didn't, didn't, and doesn't.
That French test was of physical controls, not subtle customs coding like the wine example. It's like the difference between an integration test and beta testing. Of course there will be issues, on both sides.
And on a more theoretical level, if the EEC had continued as-is and hadn't transformed itself into a political union then we probably wouldn't have had Brexit. So who's to blame?
- orwin 6y ago> Of course there will be issues, on both sides. Yet for now one side seems a lot less prepared than the other one. > And on a more theoretical level, if the EEC had continued as-is and hadn't transformed itself into a political union then we probably wouldn't have had Brexit. So who's to blame? Sorry? Then why not join under Shengen's deal like Switzerland? Nothing to do politically with the UE, same rules and duty as the EEC used to have with some right removed. But Shengen dealt exclusively with trade and movement. Who's to blame? People that never thought about "what would happen if..." and voted anyway. Who will suffer? Always the same.
- Arnt 6y agoWhat are the issues that "of course there will be", I mean the ones that the French didn't catch in their preparation or (several) tests?