4 ms·

I really don't see how a theory that can't be invalidated is useful for anything, other than a rhetorical device. Apart from a thought experiment along the lin

I really don't see how a theory that can't be invalidated is useful for anything, other than a rhetorical device. Apart from a thought experiment along the lines of The Flying Spaghetti Monster, what good is a theory that can never be tested? It's a tautology.

michaelt 6y ago
Well, you can also use it to transmute your feelings of inadequacy into feelings of cleverness and insight. It's not that life's passing me by as I punch a keyboard at a big multinational, no siree, it's those those people posting pictures of themselves having fun who are the real fools.
ZephyrBlu 6y ago
I find it hard to believe you have never seen social signaling 'in the wild'. A lot of behaviour that otherwise seems nonsensical can be explained by social signaling. Why do rich people often spend tons of money on things they don't need or use? To impress other rich people.
- Judgmentality 6y ago
  I find it hard to believe you have never seen the flying spaghetti monster 'in the wild'. A lot of behaviour that otherwise seems nonsensical can be explained by the flying spaghetti monster. Why do rich people often spend tons of money on things they don't need or use? To impress the flying spaghetti monster.
  - feanaro 6y ago
    This is not equivalent since it is reliant on the existence of the FSM, which is not usually taken to be proven, unlike (hopefully) the existence of other people.
    - Judgmentality 6y ago
      How is the existence of other people proof of signalling theory? I believe you exist. Signalling theory could, for example, say I am holding up this argument on the internet because I want to show others how persistent I am. How does your existence prove or disprove why I am saying what I am saying?
- Dylan16807 6y ago
  You are describing a theory of "some things are signalling", which is pretty different from "everything is signalling"
  - ZephyrBlu 6y ago
    Yes I know. The person I was replying to seemed to not believe in signaling in general though.

michaelt 6y ago

Well, you can also use it to transmute your feelings of inadequacy into feelings of cleverness and insight. It's not that life's passing me by as I punch a keyboard at a big multinational, no siree, it's those those people posting pictures of themselves having fun who are the real fools.

ZephyrBlu 6y ago

I find it hard to believe you have never seen social signaling 'in the wild'. A lot of behaviour that otherwise seems nonsensical can be explained by social signaling. Why do rich people often spend tons of money on things they don't need or use? To impress other rich people.

Judgmentality 6y ago
I find it hard to believe you have never seen the flying spaghetti monster 'in the wild'. A lot of behaviour that otherwise seems nonsensical can be explained by the flying spaghetti monster. Why do rich people often spend tons of money on things they don't need or use? To impress the flying spaghetti monster.
- feanaro 6y ago
  This is not equivalent since it is reliant on the existence of the FSM, which is not usually taken to be proven, unlike (hopefully) the existence of other people.
  - Judgmentality 6y ago
    How is the existence of other people proof of signalling theory? I believe you exist. Signalling theory could, for example, say I am holding up this argument on the internet because I want to show others how persistent I am. How does your existence prove or disprove why I am saying what I am saying?
Dylan16807 6y ago
You are describing a theory of "some things are signalling", which is pretty different from "everything is signalling"
- ZephyrBlu 6y ago
  Yes I know. The person I was replying to seemed to not believe in signaling in general though.