3 ms·
> The enormous amounts of data? If it's not valuable they can just discard it! I'm curious what the legal requirements for this will be. But I imagine they'd
by Judgmentality 6y ago
> The enormous amounts of data? If it's not valuable they can just discard it!
I'm curious what the legal requirements for this will be. But I imagine they'd want to hold on to data of driving scenarios for at least a month, in case they get accused of wrongdoing by other drivers. If they had no data to back up their case with all those sensors, it would look awfully suspicious and essentially one witness against nobody - so they'd have to hold onto the data for however long the legal teams deem is okay.
This may sound crazy, but it's already happening at the scale of testing with just a few dozen cars.
https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/06/gm-settles-with-motorcyclist-struck-by-cruise-self-driving-car/ https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/06/gm-settles-with-motorcy...
- Dylan16807 6y agoThey should keep data in case of a crash but that's a minuscule amount. I don't see any need to keep a record of everything else for a full month.
- Judgmentality 6y agoThey can be accused of a crash even if there isn't a crash though. And if they have no data to back up their side of the story, why would any court believe them? In other words - people can just randomly accuse them of hit-and-runs and they'd have nothing to say otherwise.
- Dylan16807 6y agoI don't see how it's any different from accusing random people of a hit and run. Though enough data to disprove a hit and run wouldn't actually take up very much space. Medium-resolution camera views and some acceleration data? Sure, pop a single SSD in there and it'll hold more than a month's logs.