3 ms·
I think it’s larger than you claim. If someone is willing to pay for new, but offered a lower price for used, they will likely pick the used copy. And yea char
by ABeeSea 6y ago
I think it’s larger than you claim. If someone is willing to pay for new, but offered a lower price for used, they will likely pick the used copy.
And yea chargebacks aren’t a mechanism for getting a refund. They are essentially a fraud accusation. Try doing a chargeback with amazon on a large purchase and see how long your account stays in good standing.
- monksy 6y agoWhen you are sold a game that does not work and not refund, there is fraud. (I.e. Cyberpunk PS4) Or how there are only only games that have a really poor effort to make a non-online portion. (Those are dependent upon the PSN subscription). The only time Sony gives money back is when their reputation is majorly hurt. Amazon from my experience doesn't tend to let it get this far. (Although they are terrible in their own right)
- Dylan16807 6y ago> Try doing a chargeback with amazon on a large purchase and see how long your account stays in good standing. That's the problem; when there's a legitimate cause for chargeback you still can't do one, because the big platform is going to retaliate.
- ABeeSea 6y agoWhy would a company keep doing business with someone that went to their bank and accused that company of fraud? Making a chargeback is a serious claim of malfeasance by the company that has to then be arbitrated by the third party bank. It’s not a mechanism for getting a refund; it’s an accusation of fraud who’s remedy may include a refund.
- Dylan16807 6y agoThe problem is company you bought from through the big platform did fraud, and the platform was too lazy to care. It's fine being blacklisted from that tiny fraudulent company. It's anti-consumer when a legitimate chargeback can't be filed because some giant company processed the credit card and will bring their wrath upon you.