5 ms·
At one time, Dropbox was the easiest and best solution if you were using Android, MacOS, and Windows. I used to pay for 1TB account although Apple offered 2TB f
by simplemen 6y ago
At one time, Dropbox was the easiest and best solution if you were using Android, MacOS, and Windows. I used to pay for 1TB account although Apple offered 2TB for same monthly fee. But the Dropbox destroyed their simple UI to this ugliness clusterfuck. That was the motivation for me to cancel it and move 100% into Apple's ecosystem.
- ubermonkey 6y agoI'm still not sure what I could migrate to that would give me solid and trustworthy sync/access across Windows, Mac, iOS, and Linux. I'm happy to pay whatever I pay for Dropbox -- I don't actually remember what it is -- but I'd rather they stop throwing in bullshit kitchen-sink features.
- akvadrako 6y agoI still use Dropbox because I care about what you mentioned, but I think the next best thing is Seafile, however it has bad symlink handling.
- benhurmarcel 6y agoNextcloud. You can buy the service directly at various providers, such as Hetzner. Another solution is Google Drive, adding Insync for desktop sync.
- ubermonkey 6y agoI have zero interest in administering my own services like it appears Nextcloud, even with Hetzner, would require. I've been there and done that, but I'm too far out of the sysadmin game now to do a good job of it. It's a bad use of my time, and not something I enjoy as a hobby. I'm unwilling to use Google services if I can avoid it.
- benhurmarcel 6y agoThe service I mentioned (Hetzner, but there are others) do all the administration for you. You get a login and password into a Nextcloud instance, that's it. No administration required. See here: https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-share https://www.hetzner.com/storage/storage-share
- ubermonkey 6y agoYikes! That's a lot more expensive for my data usage than Dropbox!
- benhurmarcel 6y agoThat's possible if you use more than 1 TB. Otherwise they're cheaper, quite significantly for smaller amounts.
- slazaro 6y agoI can vouch for this. I haven't really done anything on the web interface, I use it for file sync like i used to use Dropbox, and I have clients in Windows, Linux and Android and it just works.
- pedro2 6y agoYes but latest Insync adds xml suffix to files with xml contents. To keep feature parity to Google Drive Web downloads, they say. Duh! :(
- benhurmarcel 6y agoDo you have a source explaining the issue a bit more? I haven't found anything and don't exactly understand what you mean.
- pedro2 6y agoYes but it is by me :) https://forums.insynchq.com/t/extension-added-to-files-based-on-its-mime-type/16780/5 https://forums.insynchq.com/t/extension-added-to-files-based...
- benhurmarcel 6y agoIt must be specific to Windows. I can't reproduce it on Linux.
- pedro2 6y agowtf? Can you comment on the Insync Forums thread please? Thank you!
- benhurmarcel 6y agoOk, I spoke too fast. It does add the extension but only if it gets modified/moved from Google Drive. If you just sync from your PC it stays as is. That's a problem indeed.
- pedro2 6y agoYup. That must have been how I triggered it -- I moved main folder around.
- rurp 6y agoI was in a similar boat and fairly recently started using pCloud, which I've been liking a lot. It has minimal frills and just focuses on file storage and sharing. I mainly use the Linux and web clients, both of which are excellent. I don't have any association with them outside of being a happy customer.
- voisin 6y agoI made the decision to migrate away for exactly the same reason. I think they are desperately trying to be more than a “feature” (as Steve Jobs correctly labelled them) and in this desperation they are obfuscating the very feature that brought people to them in the first place.