No, because people can judge his statements themselves. Some allege he did incite violence, which could be true, but it is disputable. Liable are primarily tho

No, because people can judge his statements themselves. Some allege he did incite violence, which could be true, but it is disputable. Liable are primarily those that act. You could also say that the narrative of Russian interference had an impact on people, or the racial tensions, which were heated up by media and politicians and did result in violence as well. So again here are two completely different standards applied. To answer the questions: 1.) Doing something illegal probably. 2.) I am not a libertarian and in favor of strong social policies and not someone that believes FFA does work at all. With an exception to speech of course. Speech and thoughts are your own. I don't like vulgarity, but I have a low opinion on people that penalize others because of it. I am not in favor of regulation, I would ban those that ask to ban others. If you do not like what you read, read something else. 3.) Same question as 2. - Government regulation probably doesn't work. 4.) The end-result for governments setting the rules would basically be that few things controversial can be said and people would wander off to other platforms where they can speak their mind and have fun without big brother behind their backs.