3 ms·
Those aren't examples of violence. Did you read the whole quotes? It's a reference to the children's game whack-a-mole about banning Nazis from a platform: >
by darkarmani 6y ago
Those aren't examples of violence. Did you read the whole quotes?
It's a reference to the children's game whack-a-mole about banning Nazis from a platform:
> If we have to play an constant game of Whack-a-Nazi, I vote we whack as many Nazis as we can.
It's like you aren't even trying to hide your distortions.
- unanswered 6y ago"We really need to whack Joe Biden before he becomes president!" That's okay, right? Because it's just a children's game, right? Or is it interpreted differently depending on who the target is? Nazis, whacking them is just a game. Leftists, whacking them is srs bsns?
- darkarmani 6y ago> Or is it interpreted differently depending on who the target is? Nazis, whacking them is just a game. Did you read the full quote or not? The context matters not the targets (in this case a singular target changes the context). There is only one Joe Biden, so they way you are using it has a different context. If it was about whacking lib-trolls from your news group, that's different than specifying a person. Maybe you aren't a native english speaker, but whack-a-mole is a common carnival game. That's the context in the quote YOU picked.
- unanswered 6y agoCan you show me where "whack-a-mole" is mentioned in the original comment? It's something that exists only in your mind to excuse a call for murder. "Singular target changes the context". Okay, so "Man, Hitler sure was really good at playing whack-a-Jew, wasn't he?" This is okay by your "logic", right? The context of the "whack Nazis" comment was the worst day of domestic terrorism and murder in American history. I don't think anyone was playing carnival games at the Capitol last week, but maybe we should go ask them? Maybe the whole thing was just a misunderstood carnival game!