Not to be unpolite or as a critique to the specific paper, but I am more worried about superstupidity not being able to be contained. I like to be exposed to t

Not to be unpolite or as a critique to the specific paper, but I am more worried about superstupidity not being able to be contained. I like to be exposed to these very theoretical questions. I am aware that progress depends often on explorations of apparently useless topics (like some pure mathematics). But when I read expressions like ' neo-fear of superintelligence' and contrast the topic with real-world immediate problems I find it very difficult to relate and to take the problem seriously.