3 ms·
One interpretation is that his supporters should feel confident attacking the inauguration knowing he won’t be there to be injured. They are already openly pla
by jakelazaroff 6y ago
One interpretation is that his supporters should feel confident attacking the inauguration knowing he won’t be there to be injured.
They are already openly planning violence: https://twitter.com/slpng_giants/status/1347609631527489537?s=21 https://twitter.com/slpng_giants/status/1347609631527489537?...
- mc32 6y agoWhat? Is this pre-crime we’re getting into now? What the hell happened to us?
- jakelazaroff 6y agoHe hasn’t been charged with anything, so no. I would like to think Twitter would ban any public figure who appears to be inciting a second terrorist attack mere days after inciting a first one.
- SpicyLemonZest 6y agoThere's blood and bullet holes in the halls of Congress! Principles of neutrality and restraint fly out the window when the seat of government is attacked by a violent mob. We can't just keep our fingers crossed that they don't mean it when they say they're coming back.
- rtx 6y agoWhat is a government without neutrality.
- SpicyLemonZest 6y agoNot much more than a big gorilla with a lot of guns. That's why maintaining the principles of neutrality is so important - and why we must react so severely when someone breaches the principles of neutrality to try and install their preferred politicians into power.
- u10 6y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal)