5 ms·
No, thats not what I said. Your misinterpretation starts at the very first sentence. I said "people with guns are less likely to be brutalized by the gov or lit
by noxer 6y ago
No, thats not what I said. Your misinterpretation starts at the very first sentence.
I said "people with guns are less likely to be brutalized by the gov or literally anyone."
>And trying to do self defense with a gun is a terrible idea in most circumstances.
statistics say otherwise also statistics cant even capture the self defenses that weren't needed because someone had a gun and could have used it if needed.
>(Though trying to fight government abuse with a gun is also a terrible idea.)
trying to fighting against anyone isn't self defense. no where did I say anything the like you just made that up.
>Deciding not to carry around a gun is very different from deciding not to defend yourself. It's not victim mentality.
You are seem unable to completely read and understand my post. You cant just pick one part and ignore the rest. I clear said that if you cant defend yourself its not the same as if you voluntary dont want to. There are many valid reasons why you would not carry a gun and so if you dont have one you obliviously cant us it. Not the same as if you want to have guns removed from anyone so people no longer have a choice.
- Dylan16807 6y ago> No, thats not what I said. Your misinterpretation starts at the very first sentence. I said "people with guns are less likely to be brutalized by the gov or literally anyone." I'm not sure what the 'no' refers to? Your original post said "the gov or literally anyone". Your second post only talked about the gov part, so I reminded you about the "literally anyone" part. Where's the misinterpretation? > trying to fighting against anyone isn't self defense. no where did I say anything the like you just made that up. Let me rephrase. Self defense against the government with a gun is a terrible idea. > You are seem unable to completely read and understand my post. You cant just pick one part and ignore the rest. I clear said that if you cant defend yourself its not the same as if you voluntary dont want to. You did say that. You also equated choosing not to carry a gun with choosing not to defend yourself, with the phrases "Who would have thought that people with guns are less likely to be brutalized by the gov or literally anyone." and "their own actions or inactions makes them the victim" Are you telling me you didn't mean to equate those? If so then your original post was written misleadingly, and I don't even know who you're even accusing of victim mentality anymore. If you did mean to equate those, then I still think your opinion is hot garbage.
- noxer 6y agoI wont even bother to read that. you disagree I got it have a nice day.