4 ms·
Again, that is not true. Trees need CO2 for respiration. Basic biology, folks.
by pmiller2 6y ago
Again, that is not true. Trees need CO2 for respiration. Basic biology, folks.
- adrianN 6y agoBasic biology should tell you that the only thing that counts for carbon capture is biomass added. Anything that the tree does that doesn't permanently add to its mass can't capture carbon permanently. Hence, once a tree stops growing, it stops capturing carbon. It still respirates because it does things that require energy, but any carbon it captures doing so is released fairly quickly again, e.g. when the leaves it produced in spring fall off and rot. Of course many trees keep growing a little even after they reach maturity, but the rate of growth is minuscule. A mature stable forest stores a large amount of carbon, but it hardly captures any more.
- pmiller2 6y agoWell, you know what? Plants reproduce, too. And, BTW, trees don't stop growing. They keep adding mass in their trunks. Literally the first google hit for "do trees stop growing": https://earthsky.org/earth/what-makes-a-tree-stop-growing https://earthsky.org/earth/what-makes-a-tree-stop-growing Edit: guess what? They even grow faster as they get older! https://www.npr.org/2014/01/16/262479807/old-trees-grow-faster-with-every-year https://www.npr.org/2014/01/16/262479807/old-trees-grow-fast...
- adrianN 6y agoThat is a different point. Anyway, the land we have is limited. You literally can't cover the planet in one big forest to capture the gigatons of carbon we have released. You have to do active forest management and store the carbon somewhere stable, for example as biochar.
- pmiller2 6y agoReducing the numbers of those pesky humans would help.
- adrianN 6y agoYou can't reduce the number of humans quickly enough without a genocide.
- pmiller2 6y agoDoesn't mean we still don't need to reduce numbers for long term sustainability.
- imtringued 6y agoThat's the one thing climate change is good at once it gets bad. I thought we wanted to avoid this?
- pmiller2 6y agoNo. The one thing we want to avoid is making the Earth into an unlivable hellscape for those who remain alive.