3 ms·
Only about 5% of published objections to any given use of this technology is grounded in real principle. 95% is situational based on which "side" will be tacti
by bpodgursky 6y ago
Only about 5% of published objections to any given use of this technology is grounded in real principle. 95% is situational based on which "side" will be tactically punished by the usage.
(Everyone will inevitably try to hedge their hedges with "But this situation is different/worse/xyz, it doesn't change the root objections. Elephant leading the rider.)
- IfOnlyYouKnew 6y agoThe article really has nothing to do with face recognition. And in general, I'm having trouble coming up with any scenario or example where one "side" would see disproportionate impact from face recognition? Aside, that is, from the well-known generic problems with the criminal justice system. As such your imaginary 5 % isn't just too low or too high... I don't think there is any realistic way for your argument to be anything more than some so-so story your brain came up with given a bunch of prior believes.