3 ms·

He literally called them special and said that he loved them. As in, he used the words "you're special" and "[I] love you". It's not ambiguous or subject to deb

• Supermancho 6y ago
  > He literally called them special and said that he loved them. > he used the words "you're special" and "[I] love you". It's not ambiguous or subject to debate Trump did not select those specific people out for praise ("the people invading the Capitol in Camp Auschwitz t-shirts were special and he loves them" - philk10), which was the implication. philk10's comment is ambiguous, which then goes on a derail about what words were used.
  • sidlls 6y ago
    He didn’t single out any specific group: it was all-inclusive. As in, including those individuals. This isn’t debatable or ambiguous, and it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding of how words and language work to suggest otherwise.
    • Supermancho 6y ago
      > This isn’t debatable or ambiguous "This" meaning the original point, was stated with an ambiguous point, as described. > it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding I laid out the progression, but you are ignoring it with misplaced hubris. That's fine. Good luck with whatever.
    • fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
      What is wrong with caring for all people? You people are ridiculous. You claim to be "the good guys", yet betray your hatred for your opponents on every turn. This kind of thing is why you are the enemy and must be fought at all cost. And I don't mean to be put into camps. You can still be cared for, but you must not be given power over other people. Now you won, enjoy your newfound Utopia. I'm glad I don't live in the US, although I fear this will have bad consequences for the rest of the world as well. RIP freedom.