6 ms·

Claims he won in a landslide and that the people invading the Capitol in Camp Auschwitz t-shirts were special and he loves them

fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
Bullshit
- jeromegv 6y ago
  Nope, he did say exactly that. He felt very special about them and loves them. Transcript and video is not hard to find.
  - fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
    I'm sure he didn't mention "Camp Auschwitz". What is known about that guy anyway? Maybe he is a leftist who wants to warn about fascism. I think Biden and so on showed sympathy to BLM rioters as well. What is wrong with trying to understand people's needs and pains? It's ridiculous how you people twist everything Trump says. It also shows what your "opponents" can expect under your rule. I bet you would put "Camp Auschwitz" guy into your own version of Camp Auschwitz in no time, and you wouldn't even feel bad about it. You don't realize that Socialism is just as murderous, and that is what you people stand for.
- sidlls 6y ago
  He literally called them special and said that he loved them. As in, he used the words "you're special" and "[I] love you". It's not ambiguous or subject to debate.
  - Supermancho 6y ago
    > He literally called them special and said that he loved them. > he used the words "you're special" and "[I] love you". It's not ambiguous or subject to debate Trump did not select those specific people out for praise ("the people invading the Capitol in Camp Auschwitz t-shirts were special and he loves them" - philk10), which was the implication. philk10's comment is ambiguous, which then goes on a derail about what words were used.
    - sidlls 6y ago
      He didn’t single out any specific group: it was all-inclusive. As in, including those individuals. This isn’t debatable or ambiguous, and it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding of how words and language work to suggest otherwise.
      - Supermancho 6y ago
        > This isn’t debatable or ambiguous "This" meaning the original point, was stated with an ambiguous point, as described. > it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding I laid out the progression, but you are ignoring it with misplaced hubris. That's fine. Good luck with whatever.
      - fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
        What is wrong with caring for all people? You people are ridiculous. You claim to be "the good guys", yet betray your hatred for your opponents on every turn. This kind of thing is why you are the enemy and must be fought at all cost. And I don't mean to be put into camps. You can still be cared for, but you must not be given power over other people. Now you won, enjoy your newfound Utopia. I'm glad I don't live in the US, although I fear this will have bad consequences for the rest of the world as well. RIP freedom.
- boston_clone 6y ago
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcfcTB9-S2s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcfcTB9-S2s Here is the video, in all its slurred shame.
  - fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
    Can't watch right now, but I am sure he didn't mention "Camp Auschwitz". Your interpretation is Bullshit.

fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago

Bullshit

jeromegv 6y ago
Nope, he did say exactly that. He felt very special about them and loves them. Transcript and video is not hard to find.
- fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
  I'm sure he didn't mention "Camp Auschwitz". What is known about that guy anyway? Maybe he is a leftist who wants to warn about fascism. I think Biden and so on showed sympathy to BLM rioters as well. What is wrong with trying to understand people's needs and pains? It's ridiculous how you people twist everything Trump says. It also shows what your "opponents" can expect under your rule. I bet you would put "Camp Auschwitz" guy into your own version of Camp Auschwitz in no time, and you wouldn't even feel bad about it. You don't realize that Socialism is just as murderous, and that is what you people stand for.
sidlls 6y ago
He literally called them special and said that he loved them. As in, he used the words "you're special" and "[I] love you". It's not ambiguous or subject to debate.
- Supermancho 6y ago
  > He literally called them special and said that he loved them. > he used the words "you're special" and "[I] love you". It's not ambiguous or subject to debate Trump did not select those specific people out for praise ("the people invading the Capitol in Camp Auschwitz t-shirts were special and he loves them" - philk10), which was the implication. philk10's comment is ambiguous, which then goes on a derail about what words were used.
  - sidlls 6y ago
    He didn’t single out any specific group: it was all-inclusive. As in, including those individuals. This isn’t debatable or ambiguous, and it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding of how words and language work to suggest otherwise.
    - Supermancho 6y ago
      > This isn’t debatable or ambiguous "This" meaning the original point, was stated with an ambiguous point, as described. > it’s disingenuous bordering on willful misunderstanding I laid out the progression, but you are ignoring it with misplaced hubris. That's fine. Good luck with whatever.
    - fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
      What is wrong with caring for all people? You people are ridiculous. You claim to be "the good guys", yet betray your hatred for your opponents on every turn. This kind of thing is why you are the enemy and must be fought at all cost. And I don't mean to be put into camps. You can still be cared for, but you must not be given power over other people. Now you won, enjoy your newfound Utopia. I'm glad I don't live in the US, although I fear this will have bad consequences for the rest of the world as well. RIP freedom.
boston_clone 6y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcfcTB9-S2s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcfcTB9-S2s Here is the video, in all its slurred shame.
- fsdfgsfsdfsdfsd 6y ago
  Can't watch right now, but I am sure he didn't mention "Camp Auschwitz". Your interpretation is Bullshit.