3 ms·
When "let us go back to work, my family is starving and we're going to lose the house!" is characterized as "they just want to get haircuts!" it's worse than ce
by caseysoftware 6y ago
When "let us go back to work, my family is starving and we're going to lose the house!" is characterized as "they just want to get haircuts!" it's worse than censorship. It's mockery of people's suffering.
Move down the hierarchy of needs a bit and listen to what people are discussing. It's not trade policy.
- lifeformed 6y agoAgain, that's a mainstream topic that you see everywhere. Everyone is concerned about that, it's not some secret qualm.
- disgruntledphd2 6y agoLets be clear though, those people would have been better supported such that they wouldn't have needed to make a choice between eating and the pandemic if the outgoing Federal government hadn't made such a mess of their response (and refused point blank to support state and local governments who cannot borrow).
- ed25519FUUU 6y agoLocal governments took as much money as they could to shore up their own finances including and especially their payrolls. Props to the food banks and other organizations that did so much with so little.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]