4 ms·
omg, someone could not have designed a better conspiracy machine than this publication's standard retraction process. Missing abstract. no way to find rejected
by patcon 6y ago
omg, someone could not have designed a better conspiracy machine than this publication's standard retraction process. Missing abstract. no way to find rejected article. People will go absolutely loopy with that
- the_only_law 6y agoYeah it’s a shame they don’t link the original text. You can find copies pretty easily with a google search of the title, albeit with a big, opaque redacted watermark on the pages. I’m sure if you really want it you could find it with a bit more effort though.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- wtf_srsly 6y agoIt's actually quite easy to find. Just click on the DOI link for the full paper (https://doi.org/10.23812/20-269-e-4 https://doi.org/10.23812/20-269-e-4).
- patcon 6y agoThanks. But wow, so it's that easy to be accidentally complicit...