5 ms·
Salaries would fall due to increased supply. A union would keep salaries high by not keeping the gates open (if it were modeled on the film industry unions).
by labcomputer 6y ago
Salaries would fall due to increased supply. A union would keep salaries high by not keeping the gates open (if it were modeled on the film industry unions).
- throwaway894345 6y agoAdditionally, the low hanging fruit for automation is going to diminish. We'll always have things to automate, but in general those things will decrease in value.
- hnuser847 6y ago> A union would keep salaries high by not keeping the gates open That’s the same argument people use against immigration. I realize HN is a diverse place and not everybody has the same opinion on these matters, but I find it interesting that people here generally support labor protectionism when it applies to high-income earners like software engineers, but they don’t support closing the borders in order to increase the wages of low-income earners.
- derivagral 6y agoUSA-centric (but not in the south): I'm pretty open to most immigration. The "close our borders" discussion tends to lump in skilled-worker programs; I think those are usually more amenable to most than general immigration. Regardless, my country was built on immigration and I think it'd be foolish to lose sight of that.
- vsskanth 6y agoThat's because everyone is a liberal until their job or salary is on the line.
- ahepp 6y agoThis is what I'd consider the "traditional" answer to the function of a union. I think it makes plenty of sense. The parent comment seemed to me to suggest that a union would both keep the door open and the price high, and I don't see any clear way a union would do that.