By your logic every hardware vendor should pay for the development of all software (or at least all open source software) that aims to run on that hardware. Whi

By your logic every hardware vendor should pay for the development of all software (or at least all open source software) that aims to run on that hardware. Which is plain ridiculous. Apple is pretty collaborating in this transition. Not paying for development of every remotely popular project under the sun does not make them “noncollaborating”. Apple ships a Python.framework and a user-facing python3 installation through CLT, so I expect them to contribute to CPython. And they did. They don’t ship anything remotely related to PyPy, so I don’t expect them to do anything. A gesture would be nice, but that’s being nice.