4 ms·
C'mon. These companies are fleeing because they can't be competitive in the local labor market. Who wants to work at HPE or Oracle? Almost literally nobody.
by outside1234 6y ago
C'mon. These companies are fleeing because they can't be competitive in the local labor market.
Who wants to work at HPE or Oracle? Almost literally nobody.
- danielsht 6y agoIs the same true of Tesla? I know of plenty of people who work or would like to work for Tesla. Another group of companies that haven't received as much attention in the recent "SF exodus" narrative are Google and FB. Google has been opening large offices outside of SF for years and is slowly contributing to the growing of tech hubs around the country. Google's Boulder office comes to mind as a good example. I'm not aware of any large FB spokes, but FB remote work allowance might end up having a similar effect. Not to mention the many startups that have realized that the distributed model works fairly well if you know how to do it, and opens up a large talent pool. I currently work for such a startup and we don't plan on going to back to a central SF office model post pandemic.
- moocow01 6y agoTo be fair Tesla hasn't moved as of yet
- jjulius 6y agoYeah, and Google's HQ remains in Mountain View.
- 11thEarlOfMar 6y agoAnd Facebook, Google, Nvidia and Apple all spent $1 Billion + to build new headquarters in the last 5 years. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/jul/23/inside-billion-dollar-palaces-of-tech-giants-facebook-apple-google-london-california-wealth-power https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/jul/23/inside-... https://officesnapshots.com/2018/10/15/nvidia-headquarters-santa-clara/ https://officesnapshots.com/2018/10/15/nvidia-headquarters-s...
- tomjakubowski 6y agoGoogle is not part of any California exodus, but the opposite. In addition to building and buying outside the state, they have been aggressively expanding, not contracting, their square footage within California.
- Justin_K 6y agoWhile it's catchy and hip to say that nobody wants to work for these companies, the reality is hundreds of thousands do. Both your example companies may not be popular with the cool kids and have their own controversies, but they offer great pay, benefits and consist of a lot of smart people.
- rdw 6y agoThey don't really have great pay, though, do they? They can't afford to pay what qualified employees demand in California. So they move to a state where the average expected salary is lower. Oracle's reputation was of abysmal pay for senior employees, for decades. I'm willing to bet that economically they should have moved a long time ago, but Larry Ellison's pride kept them in the Bay Area. He designed the campus buildings to look like database icons, that's not something you give up easily.
- Justin_K 6y agoI'm pretty sure the HQ change has more to do with laws and a tax base vs. where you have the most buildings.
- bpodgursky 6y agoThe labor market has been catastrophically expensive for over a decade. They dealt with it. If anything, the flood of new wait-me-too CS grads and bootcamp graduates over the past couple years is great for legacy employers willing to slup up anyone who can write a line of code. The tax market is the new problem. Now they are leaving.
- athms 6y agoHPE and Oracle didn't leave the state, they moved their headquarters. The Oracle campus in Redwood City and the HPE campus in San Jose will remain, and they continue to hire locally. Also of note, both companies are incorporated in Delaware and that will continue to be the case.
- oh_sigh 6y ago200,000+ people work at those companies. I'm guessing not all of them are being held hostage there.