5 ms·

This registry will be used to deny people of services.

• orwin 6y ago
  Even if its true, I'm sorry, but so what? Okay, context here. Around 2015, a measle epidemics broke out between switzerland and Eastern France. less than 2000 cases, 12 dead and a bit more than a hundred children disabled (the fever was too hot for the brain and they lost cognitive functions). Unluckily, in a school where barely 60% of children where vaccinated, lived a child who survived leukemia. Chemo was part of her treatment, so she never received a vaccine, not by their parent choice btw. I took care of her during my youth camp concellor days so i know she was very carefull with infections and hygiene. Well, anyway, she died from measles. I don't care if you don't vaccinate your child, but if you don't, you should have to remove your child from school or club activities the moment an immunodepressed child enter it. Sorry if not vaccinating your child or yourself will deny you from service, i don't care. You have a choice, they don't.
  • eznzt 6y ago
    Isn't the immunodepressed child the kid with the problem? Shouldn't he be denied of services instead of the healthy kid? It sounds so backwards.
    • hef19898 6y ago
      The difference is choice. One child doesn't have a choice, the other does. Now, which one do you exclude from public life? I'd say the one that did not take necessary steps to protect themselves and others by choice. Personal freedom ends where others freedom begins, it also comes with great responsibility. All these "my freedom" people are simply spoiled, scared egoists in my opinion. EDIT: In case of children, it is obviously the parents choice. Which goes back to the responsibility part.
• glogla 6y ago
  As it should be. People who refused to follow safety measures should have their ability to hurt others limited.