17 ms·
They’re clearly not “normal” if most fonts don’t have them (as default glyphs; many fonts have them as alternates).
by amake 6y ago
They’re clearly not “normal” if most fonts don’t have them (as default glyphs; many fonts have them as alternates).
- samcheng 6y agoBy "normal" he means the glyph we are taught to write by hand, which is also the glyph young children are taught to identify individual letters.
- userbinator 6y agoI personally write, and have seen many others use as well, the "two-storey" a and g, so I suspect there's regional variation.
- amake 6y agoYes, my point was that that is a very narrow view of “normal”.
- Dylan16807 6y agoThat's what context does, it narrows!