2 ms·
Oh, I don't care about that. He can bone whoever he likes. It's the modeling he loses credibility on.
by bpodgursky 6y ago
Oh, I don't care about that. He can bone whoever he likes. It's the modeling he loses credibility on.
- mellosouls 6y agoThanks for the clarification, though I'm not sure that strengthens your case against him - while there may be dissenting voices his work is still considered mainstream I think?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- frereubu 6y agoIf you want people to know what you're saying, you need to unpack your comment more than your initial one. I also read this as a snide aside about his love life, which is a pretty easy interpretation. Do you have a link to something more substantive than your comments here? Edit: The quote seems pretty clear - "we see it in the data" - which would just be a higher rate of infections in children, and he's clearly speaking as a member of NERVTAG, not just as himself.
- flukus 6y agoI think this argument is just a variant of: 1. Scientist predicts x by y. 2. Politicians take action to prevent x by y. 3. x by y didn't happen, therefor scientists were wrong. It's like complaining your sys admins do nothing because nothing ever breaks. Or that Y2K was a conspiracy theory because it was prevented.