4 ms·
> If it’s so small as to not be meaningful, why collect it? Well they aren't collecting it from just one person, so the number's really big on one side (in agg
by staticassertion 6y ago
> If it’s so small as to not be meaningful, why collect it?
Well they aren't collecting it from just one person, so the number's really big on one side (in aggregate) and it's really small on the other side.
- 1123581321 6y agoI understand that. In aggregate, it’s not a large additional amount for the state of California. (Most of CA’s income is aggregated from many sources.) How is it meaningful outside of CA insisting they would like to have it, in a way that precludes the taxed entity from claiming they have a meaningful use for it?