Judging from the above quotes, there wouldn't be anything substantial to peer-review. One does not propose a different set of principals governing the universe

Judging from the above quotes, there wouldn't be anything substantial to peer-review. One does not propose a different set of principals governing the universe without both proving that the these principals reflect previous theories in all applicable energy regimes ( the correspondence principal ) and predicts new physics. The above quotes bear no practical relation to existing physics. What's claimed here is that he developed such a physical theory, an experimental apparatus which detects affects from this theory and developed a workable device which leverages those affects to achieve ground breaking propulsive effects.