3 ms·
True, the decade argument isn't fool proof. For non mathematically provable problems (is X a scam? as opposed to 1+1==2?), I find it easier to reason on the bas
by silentsea90 6y ago
True, the decade argument isn't fool proof. For non mathematically provable problems (is X a scam? as opposed to 1+1==2?), I find it easier to reason on the basis of ML like features with their respective weights. The longevity of sustained BTC valuation is just one feature here, not sufficient on its own.