7 ms·
Von Braun Class Station
- peter_d_sherman 6y ago>"The Gateway Foundation was formed to build the first spaceport. To do that we must first build a few smaller structures. One of the most important projects is the Von Braun Class of rotating space stations. This will likely be the first commercial space construction project in history."
- ahelwer 6y agoMaybe we should stop naming things after a man who was not only a nazi, but a uniform-wearing member of the SS? A future-looking project should leave such things in the past.
- emteycz 6y agoVon Braun Station is a technical type/design, not the project's own name. Using designers' names normal with space designs.
- JoeAltmaier 6y agoLots of better names are available: "Originally proposed by Konstantin Tsiolkovsky in 1903, the idea was expanded by Herman Potočnik in 1929."
- rbanffy 6y agoIt's telling that between a nazi and a communist, some people would choose the nazi.
- gnarbarian 6y agoTake your pick based on if you are more comfortable with mass killings based on political affiliation or race.
- rbanffy 6y agoI prefer people who don't employ genocide victims as slaves for building weapons of mass destruction, but that's me.
- gnarbarian 6y agoIf that's your actual beef, Forced Labor Camps/ Gulags were far more heavily used by the Soviet Union than by the Nazis. They were also used to produce weapons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag#Economic_role https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag#Economic_role
- rsynnott 6y ago“Far more heavily used” is incorrect (particularly in Tsiolkovsky‘s time; they became a big deal a bit later), but yes, the gulags existed. Tsiolkovsky wasn’t personally involved with them, though (he was a maths teacher).
- avmich 6y agoAccording to Chertok, GULAG workforce wasn't used at least when Baykonur, a significant project, was being built. It was direct involvement of Army corps used there. Imprisoned labor force was used in WWII time Soviet aviation and rocketry development (Tupolev, Glushko, Korolyov). Other large projects were possibly too technical, challenging to employ forced labor?..
- elil17 6y agoSorry to be a little pedantic but genocide specifically means mass killing based on race, ethnicity, or nationality. The word was coined in response to the Nazi Holocaust because the systemtimatic, ethnically motivated killings were considered to be so abhorrent. There’s no such thing as genocide based on political affiliation.
- gnarbarian 6y agoA fair point but not an undisputed one. https://news.stanford.edu/2010/09/23/naimark-stalin-genocide-092310/ https://news.stanford.edu/2010/09/23/naimark-stalin-genocide... "All early drafts of the U.N. genocide convention included social and political groups in its definition. But one hand that wasn’t in the room guided the pen. The Soviet delegation vetoed any definition of genocide that might include the actions of its leader, Joseph Stalin. The Allies, exhausted by war, were loyal to their Soviet allies – to the detriment of subsequent generations. Naimark argues that that the narrow definition of genocide is the dictator’s unacknowledged legacy to us today."
- rsynnott 6y agoTsiolkovsky lived in the Soviet Union, where he worked as a maths teacher. Von Braun was a member of the Nazi party and SS who made weapons with an enormous slave labour force; by some estimates more people died making the things than were killed by them. Personally, I’d probably go for the maths teacher, when it comes to naming stuff.
- perennate 6y agoWhy quote that when the Wikipedia article that it's from is titled "rotating wheel space station"? Rotating wheel is more descriptive than Von Braun or Tsiolkovsky or Potočnik.
- emteycz 6y agoThere are many kinds of rotating wheel space stations with differences in layout, size, complexity, etc.
- dracozny 6y agoYou merely point out a very small subset of where he was from and his employer of the time, yet zero attention to his ideals and life legacy. https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/history/vonbraun/bio.html https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/history/vonbraun/bio.h...
- ahelwer 6y ago"His employer of the time" is doing a lot of work for voluntarily joining the Nazi party, later misrepresenting that fact, voluntarily joining the SS, getting promoted a bunch of times, and regularly wearing his SS uniform to work. Lots of terrible people have accomplished great and useful things. Good for them! I'm not taking that away from them. Just leave them & their names in the past where they belong. This is standard practice in medicine, a field with its own share of past nazis.
- trhway 6y ago> zero attention to his ideals and life legacy. the one's ideals and legacy are worth less than nothing if it is built, with the one's full awareness and willful participation, by concentration camp slaves dying in droves from malnutrition, physical abuse and the hard labor while building those ideals and legacy. > employer of the time that defense line of "i was just carrying out the orders" was explicitly addressed at the Nuremberg trials.
- fastball 6y agoI didn't realize that concentration camp victims were building rockets?
- zzzeek 6y agowell they were and it was quite horrific! > The record of Nordhausen is a most unenviable one, and we were told that 250 of the slave workers perished every day, due to overwork and malnutrition. ... They also saw stretchers heavily saturated in blood, a room in which there was a slab on which the bodies were drained of blood, and the incinerators in which the bodies were burnt. > Wernher von Braun, the Technical Director of a separate facility at Peenemünde Army Research Center, visited the Mittelwerk on 25 January 1944,[12] and a 1991 author alleged he witnessed Mittelwerk and Buchenwald war crimes.[6] but by all means name this space station after the guy who ran the whole operation and claimed to have no idea. because they just can't think of a single person besides him! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mittelwerk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mittelwerk
- bigbubba 6y agoOnce ze rockets go up, who cares where they come down? Zat's not my department, says Werner Von Braun.
- AndrewBissell 6y agoFor those who don't know, this is from a very cutting song by Tom Lehrer: https://youtu.be/TjDEsGZLbio https://youtu.be/TjDEsGZLbio
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- reitzensteinm 6y agoI think this is a pretty good overview, an interview with the author of a recent biography. I am partial to your view. I don't have a problem recognizing his achievements and celebrating his abilities, but using his name to honor him is going further than that. There are probably still people alive today that had a parent that died in slave labor at Mittelwerk building his rockets. I can't imagine how awful this would feel for them. Regardless of his achievements, his legacy should carry a stain. https://www.airspacemag.com/space/a-amp-s-interview-michael-j-neufeld-23236520/ https://www.airspacemag.com/space/a-amp-s-interview-michael-...
- chadash 6y ago> There are probably still people alive today that had a parent that died in slave labor at Mittelwerk building his rockets. My grandfather, who is still alive, was a slave laborer there before he was liberated by the American army. His descriptions of the place are pretty horrific.
- lreeves 6y agoCompletely tasteless, I really don't get why you would put any effort into this project and name it after a Nazi (unless, and I'm being extra cynical here, that's the way they lean??)
- matz1 6y agoMaybe people should stop living in the past, naming after nazi doesn't necessarily mean supporting nazi.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ahelwer 6y agoThere's a difference between supporting nazism and choosing to honor a nazi, sure, but we shouldn't do either.
- matz1 6y ago>choosing to honor a nazi Not even that, using that name, doesn't necessarily mean to honor nazi.
- ahelwer 6y agoAre you implying the name could be referring to a different von Braun? Or are you denying that Wernher von Braun was a nazi?
- matz1 6y agoVon Braun was a nazi but doesn't necessarily mean by using his name is to honor nazi action.
- ahelwer 6y ago...I literally addressed this two comments prior: "There's a difference between supporting nazism and choosing to honor a nazi, sure, but we shouldn't do either." Using von Braun's name isn't "honoring nazi action", but it is honoring a nazi. Not sure where this isn't connecting with you.
- matz1 6y ago
- friendlybus 6y agoThere's a certain lack of credibility in this complaint when the space race and a great source of global unity was found in the moon landing off the back of the Saturn V. The Americans had the choice to erase werner von braun from significance and instead chose to benefit on a grand scale from his slave-built knowledge. You're right Von Braun is part of the past now. He's apart of the Usa's past. It's difficult to hear complaints about his nazi past, long after all the hard choices about what it means were already made. VB's work is inexplicibly stamped into space flight and trying to get rid of that influence now, is like having your cake and eating it too.
- ahelwer 6y agoMany other fields have this same problem with terrible people making foundational contributions. The usual compromise is to rename phenomena that were named after them, not name any new things after them, and let their name drift into history. The history of the field is there for anyone who wants it, but it is just that - history. They are not venerated going forward. If you want to make the case that this field should be forced to bear von Braun's name as a stain, I guess that's a somewhat interesting idea but I think it would have the effect of improving von Braun's legacy rather than forcing spaceflight to reckon with its past.
- friendlybus 6y agoI would let the things he did sit with is name and prevent future things being named after him. White-washing your past after you make billions off the back of slaves he killed and his work, is just a little too much sting to bear. I don't think you should be 'forced to bear his name as a stain'. It's just reality for what your space agencies did and hiding it isn't a valuable addition.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- TimTheTinker 6y agoSounds like some great ideas for SpaceX to implement. ... don't get me wrong, this is really great, but I have doubts whether this company will be able to financially accomplish this without an already-established revenue stream and no previous projects accomplished yet. Who knows, maybe they will be able to accomplish this, but if SpaceX's success teaches us anything, doing so probably requires someone at the helm with a stomach for huge financial risk as well as unique financial and engineering savvy. It also requires a clear roadmap involving smaller, revenue-generating wins.
- f00zz 6y agoI'm getting some Mars One vibes from this.
- nullifidian 6y agoThis video by Columbia based researchers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3D7QlMVa5s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3D7QlMVa5s says that Coriolis acceleration induced canal sickness could be a major issue, and we don't know exactly what humans can tolerate. In the worst case scenario such torus has to be about one kilometer in diameter, which is prohibitively expensive.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- codesnik 6y agoI once made napkin calculations that for 1g "gravitation" a station even about 50 meters in diameter would introduce coriolis force so great you'll have a lot of trouble even trying to stand up from a chair.
- mrfusion 6y agoKeep in mind though even .1 G (or less?) still gets you a lot of the benefits of gravity. Normal toilets, showers, dining, cooking, etc.
- aetherson 6y agoNobody knows what effects long-term exposure to low, but not zero, gravity will have, but assuming that it is substantially better than microgravity, stations with rotational gravity of somewhere in the 1-5m/s2 seem like they may offer benefits with substantially lower engineering challenges.
- nradov 6y agoRight let's start with 0.1G as a proof of concept and then build larger, faster rotating habitats later.
- codesnik 6y agothough, station doesn't have to be a torus. Zubrin said something about two starships chained together with a loong cable. That could work.
- firefix 6y agoMan. Von Braun? That’s not someone to name anything after. Please read Operation Paperclip by Annie Jacobsen. What Von Braun did was beyond horrible so much so to make the death camps look less bad in comparison, which is really saying something. They plowed through people making them death march then dig huge underground missile factories with their bare hands, then had them make missiles to kill their families and to help their enemies try to win the war, with the majority of them dying in the process.
- frostburg 6y agoAmong other things, it must be said that each V2 was completely useless to the war effort and cost as much as several tanks. They didn't even tie up anti-air resources because it was impossible to intercept one.
- Thrymr 6y agoIt also took ~30,000 potatoes to make the alcohol fuel for each rocket, while German food supplies were running low during the last winter of the war [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocket https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocket
- sesuximo 6y agoThat books is really powerful. Something about it hit me more than other things on the topic
- stevespang 6y agoHey, all that's missing in the deal is a crypto offering [sic] . . .
- jjazwiecki 6y agoThe Better Business Bureau logo in the footer actually made me more dubious.
- kevin_thibedeau 6y agoIt's easier to bootstrap this by starting with habitable spokes. Docking three starships to a hub and spinning them up is simpler than a Ferris wheel.
- paranoidrobot 6y agoWarning: the video on their site contains completely unnecessary and pointless stock images of severe medical conditions that are quite shocking. I stopped and bailed after the first few images. Whatever they're trying to encourage support for, they've completely lost it as far as I'm concerned.
- lreeves 6y agoIt is weird to show but unless I missed something it seems like it's just severe water retention in the legs and a back rash, I don't think those are shocking but maybe I have an iron stomach.
- Waterluvian 6y agoWhere's the Rickenbacker?
- Ancapistani 6y agoI think Solar Warden already took that name.
- MichaelZuo 6y agoIt’s an interesting design for a Torus, seems technical and economically doable once SpaceX’s starship gets going and with some motivated billionaires/organizations pooling together money. If it could even generate enough revenue to cover operating costs that would be a huge win and serve as great demonstrator for future endeavours. An ambitious timeline would be by 2040. Recovering the cost of capital may need a much more developed market. An ambitious timeline here may be by 2070, a full generation later.
- Gravityloss 6y agoIf you had a 200 meter diameter station going around once per minute, the acceleration would be 1 m/s (1/10 gee). Sounds buildable. It is not known what level of gravity attenuates the health effects to what degree. This kind of a structure is going to be flimsy. An odd number of spokes like five would lessen the chance of harmonic vibrations.