3 ms·
With freedom, humans can control for this by learning from it. They can see that cars don't necessarily get you women despite of what the ads say. This can also
by AntiImperialist 6y ago
With freedom, humans can control for this by learning from it. They can see that cars don't necessarily get you women despite of what the ads say. This can also be indirect learning by someone pointing it out.
If you start making certain things illegal to say, you can use that against people. For example, given enough money for lawyers, you can sue people for saying that "these cars don't get you women" using the same anti-free speech regulations by finding holes and exceptions in them. History has shown that lawyers can pull this off.
- user-the-name 6y agoNonsense. There are plenty of things you are not allowed to say, and nobody is using them as "loopholes". False advertising is a crime already, for one.
- AntiImperialist 6y ago>and nobody is using them as "loopholes" Yes, they are.
- user-the-name 6y agoWho is using false advertising laws as loopholes, then?
- yurielt 6y agoLol just of the top of my head companies like Coca Cola and also the guy who sued red bull for actually not getting wings
- user-the-name 6y agoWhat person was prevented from speaking there?