5 ms·

> If I'm understanding your position correctly, its basically that the people providing testimony are all liars? Yes? You seem to be pushing the line that thi

> If I'm understanding your position correctly, its basically that the people providing testimony are all liars? Yes? You seem to be pushing the line that this is all sincere and done in good faith, and ignoring the easily noticeable conclusion that it is a performance from bad actors for obvious selfish ends. So much so that your own good faith is questionable. Creating alt accounts to continue the spam doesn't help. > cases being dismissed is likewise not evidence of that. I disagree. I put it to you that it is closely related.

prucomaclu2 6y ago
> ignoring the easily noticeable conclusion that it is a performance from bad actors for obvious selfish ends I've listened to over a hundred of these people speak and they seem genuine to me. > I disagree. I put it to you that it is closely related. Having so many cases dismissed certainly implies that there is no evidence. I have however read the judges' opinions, and the reasons for their findings. Within their findings, I have found no reason to believe that the vast majority of people providing testimony are just outright lying. Within the judges' findings there's about 300 different reasons why the Trump legal team should be fired for incompetence. But I have yet to find any reason to disbelieve the majority of affidavits. If you do have any sources/links that go into the facts that supports this opinion, I would be extremely interested in reading it. > Creating alt accounts to continue the spam doesn't help. At this point I have stopped making any new posts. I am only responding to replies to posts that I have already made. Once those stop, I'll be out of your hair.