2 ms·
Actually this should be called Img to HTML 3.2
by jimsteinhart 16y ago
Actually this should be called Img to HTML 3.2
- dwwoelfel 16y agoHey! I think you're in the wrong place for table-bashing :) There used to be more CSS when I was using unordered lists, but it turns out that tables make for a much smaller file size.
- pbhjpbhj 16y agoIndeed, I assumed it was going to be inline base64 encoded background image or something that wasn't being stripped by MUA. It's clever for sure.