3 ms·

> Each one provided testimony with a consistent pattern: the Republican poll observers were harassed, kicked out, and not allowed to do their job. And I'm sorr

> Each one provided testimony with a consistent pattern: the Republican poll observers were harassed, kicked out, and not allowed to do their job. And I'm sorry that you take this laughable stuff at face value. The bullshit asymmetry principle means that I don't have the free time to dig into that; and if I did, I would not spend it on you. Again: the election is over and it wasn't close. This "The South will rise again" stuff would be pitiful if it wasn't so nasty.

prucomaclu 6y ago
> And I'm sorry that you take this laughable stuff at face value. If you have just 2 minutes I would kindly request you play below video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZXkAv7yKgw&list=UU8Ioh4atNDO5a0Vy2qFmauQ&ab_channel=NTD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZXkAv7yKgw&list=UU8Ioh4atND... Her testimony starts at 1:34:45. If I'm not supposed to take her testimony at "face value", how am I supposed to take it? Am I supposed to: 1) Assume she and the others are lying to get Trump elected? 2) She was on an acid trip and it never happened? 3) Something else? Please - help me understand. I am genuinely interested in why I should dismiss her and not pay her any attention.
dang 6y ago
Please don't post in the flamewar style to HN and especially please don't be a jerk to others, regardless of how wrong they are or you feel they are. We're trying for something different here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html