3 ms·
> “how can lawyers defend people who do such horrible things” It's perhaps worth noting that (in the UK at least), that should never happen, at least in the se
by dane-pgp 6y ago
> “how can lawyers defend people who do such horrible things”
It's perhaps worth noting that (in the UK at least), that should never happen, at least in the sense of a defence lawyer trying to get a "not guilty" verdict for a defendant they know is guilty:
"It's obviously unethical and illegal for a lawyer to deceive a court knowingly. If my client tells me he's guilty, I can't say he's innocent in court. I cannot call him to give evidence that I know is false or I would be a party to his perjury."[0]
Of course I'm sure it does happen all the time, but you don't need to justify a system where lawyers are lying for the benefit of their client, because that's not the system we are meant to have.
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/money/2006/jan/07/workandcareers.careers4 https://www.theguardian.com/money/2006/jan/07/workandcareers...
- noodlesUK 6y agoCorrect. Lawyers are not allowed to raise an argument that is known to them to be false. If a lawyer is told by their client that they did it, the only defence that they can legitimately raise is if there were some mitigating circumstance.
- staticman2 6y agoNot true they can say the prosecutor has provided no reliable evidence their client is guilty so the client should go free.