6 ms·

The price from a grower (with 20-30% margin) is $30-35 or about the same. It's the fact that retailers (like always) have a 100% markup (50% margin) so if you g

• Aeolun 6y ago
  > Fake trees last forever... until you throw them away, and then they still last forever. Unfortunately they look like a fake tree forever too. It’s better than no tree at all, but not very inspiring.
  • brentm 6y ago
    You'll never beat the real thing without the smell but if you spend decent money you can buy a convincing looking fake.
    • deleted 6y ago
      [deleted]
    • Retric 6y ago
      Faking the smell is straightforward, but the vaguely creepy feeling of a dying tree in your living room is another story.
      • throwaway201103 6y ago
        Also a fairly real fire hazard, as well as leaving needles everywhere that you'll find until Easter.
        • sjg007 6y ago
          We went with a fake tree this year for this reason. I wanted a real one but the excessive amount of needles and the fake one looks real enough. I do miss the smell. Have to find some candles or something... When we move and no longer have carpet I will go back to a real tree. We will probably have two, the fake one and the real one.. lol. The next issue will be storing the damn thing...
  • kelnos 6y ago
    Growing up, my parents were allergic to most types of the trees sold as christmas trees, so they gave up and bought a fake tree. They spent a decent amount on it (definitely stretched our christmas budget), and it was actually a really great tree that we enjoyed for over a decade. "Not very inspiring" is a bit of a grinchy, scroogey way to think about it... really lacks imagination. Now I get a real tree, and honestly sometimes I miss the fake one. Keeping the real tree watered and dealing with it shedding needles all the time is a pain. And you'll rarely find the "perfect" tree that doesn't have some odd misshapen-ness or branches missing in key areas. Sure, you can say that's what gives them their charm, but I guess I just got used to having a fairly symmetrical tree. I also feel a bit bad about feeding an industry that grows a tree only to cut it down so I can stick it in my house for a 6 weeks and then throw it away. This year I learned about companies that will deliver a potted tree and then take it back and keep it alive during the off season. Might give that a try next year.
    • ec109685 6y ago
      Is it better for the environment to cart a tree back and forth to your house versus starting the process again with a sapling a tree farm?
    • rrrrrrrrrrrryan 6y ago
      I would've thought that buying a tree would be a form of carbon capture: the thing has taken carbon out of the air and brought it back to the ground. Is there a particular reason you think it's environmentally unfriendly?
• freedomben 6y ago
  This is becoming less true with pre-lit trees. We paid an astounding $700 for a tree and the stupid incandescent bulbs burned out and within a couple years the lights didn't work anymore (replacing bulbs did nothing). I was furious that Pottery Barn did not use LED lights in 2016 on a tree that expensive. I ended up buying light strands and wiring them myself and I gotta say the final product, while eye bleeding expensive, is amazing. Unlike built in lights mine run all the way through the whole tree, into the middle. There are also a lot more lights now than there were before, and they have different plugs for colored lights verse white, so I can use smart plugs to toggle remotely for example. All in all a great end result, but it was probably $1,300 and 8 hours of labor to get there.
• beerandt 6y ago
  About half of the US doesn't have an economically workable species/breed of tree unless they charge those higher prices. Virgina Pine grows well in the south (was the historical staple crop until 20~25 years ago), but doesn't naturally grow in cone shaped, and requires trimming/shaping and spraying multiple times a year for the 4-8 years it takes to get a marketable tree. Most southern tree farms have replaced V.P. with Leland Cypress (not really a cypress) or a similar/derivative breed of tree with promises of low/no required tending, but they also ended up having pretty high maintenance costs and don't market as well. (They look more like privacy bushes to me, and are also sold for that purpose at nurseries.) So it ends up being cheaper/more profitable to ship trucks of harvested firs/etc from where they grow almost naturally, and "export" them clear across the country. Also, the actual/current market for locally grown trees (at least in the south) is sustained 99% by people who still want the experience of choose-and-cut. And that also costs more to run than a commoditized crop.
  • dj_mc_merlin 6y ago
    If I can ask, why do you have so much knowledge of pine industry?
    • beerandt 6y ago
      Firsthand experience. Grandparents had a +/-100 acre xmas tree farm growing up, maybe 20-30 acres of Christmas trees planted at any given time. It's all planted with timber now. Now Christmas trees look like the better money maker again.
  • brudgers 6y ago
    It's been more than a decade, but in Florida sand pine was usually an indigenous option even at Home Depot. The needles are soft and they are wonderful trees.
    • beerandt 6y ago
      Soft is pretty (and beats the hell out of pointy and prickly and sticky), but soft can't hold heavy ornaments- which is a deal breaker to most people. It's one of the downsides of Lelands and other fast growing breeds, meaning ~3 years to mature instead of 5-6. Timber has similar issues- fast growth is softer and weaker than old growth. That said, there are some amazing and beautiful types of xmas trees being bred these days, but when it comes to holiday sentiment, different doesn't always sell. Which sucks to find out after 6 years of invested time, labor, and cash. (Likely with 5 younger years of crop already planted, growing, and committed to.)