4 ms·
Presumably there would have been time for discussion if the paper had not been submitted a day before the deadline.
by laretluval 6y ago
Presumably there would have been time for discussion if the paper had not been submitted a day before the deadline.
- contemporary343 6y agoThere's still time for discussion! The paper's only in review and they would have had to make revisions anyway. I'd say it's the management that made an ultimatum to the research team.
- seppel 6y ago> The paper's only in review You submit a final version for review. You cannot change a paper significantly after it was accepted.
- ad404b8a372f2b9 6y agoOnce you submit your paper it is visible to experts you probably know (or at least know of). The double blind process does not work when the subject matter, and writing style, and citations correspond closely to specific labs or researchers. You stake your reputation as well as that of your lab/company from the moment you submit. I say this from personal experience, I once published last minute for a conference and was violently chewed out by my bosses because of things they disagreed with in the paper.
- laretluval 6y agoConferences of this kind would not allow major revisions unless they were requested by the conference's reviewers.
- sitkack 6y agoThe discussion around deadlines is moving the goal post. That is what submission deadlines are for, there is still time for discussion.