4 ms·
I honestly want the large camera manufacturers to start tapping into the computational photography realm. That tech, with their amazing sensors and glass, would
by rabuse 6y ago
I honestly want the large camera manufacturers to start tapping into the computational photography realm. That tech, with their amazing sensors and glass, would produce some amazing results.
- jdhn 6y agoThere was a post here on HN a few months ago where someone went into how the camera manufacturers are going to be challenged by phone manufacturers coming up with better and better algorithms to enhance the quality of pictures that are bumping up against physical limits such as lens size and pixel density. Edit: Here's [0] the link to the article. [0] https://photographylife.com/smartphone-vs-camera-industry https://photographylife.com/smartphone-vs-camera-industry
- nradov 6y agoIt doesn't have to be in the camera. You can do that in post with the raw files.
- crazygringo 6y agoGenerally no, because a RAW file records only the total amount of exposure per "pixel". Full computational photography requires exposure per pixel over time (so something like a "stacked RAW" needs to be invented) combined with synced data from accelerometer/gyroscope/etc. for deconvolution.
- dingaling 6y agoI honestly don't. I wish they'd spend less time developing increasingly bloated and buggy camera software features and more time on simple improvements ( like exposure bracketing using ISO instead of just shutter speed )