4 ms·
Why is it racist or sexist to not to be interested in "inclusion" (which actually means "quotas", right?) I would think that progressive activism is the minori
by caffeine 6y ago
Why is it racist or sexist to not to be interested in "inclusion" (which actually means "quotas", right?)
I would think that progressive activism is the minority rather than the default view.
Isn't it the racially discriminatory stance to make decisions based on race?
I think most rational people would rather make decisions purely on competence and facts, not identity.
- vmception 6y agoInclusion doesnt mean quotas. Say that 30 times real fast and ask a new question
- tetrometal 6y agoAnd yet you'll find numerous comments in this thread using disproportionate population statistics to erroneously declare bias and bigotry. Sure sounds like quotas are what is desired.