2 ms·

Free and Open source? Please which ones do you recommend?

• dwiash 6y ago
  Krita. I think it's way better than GIMP
  • 0x4a42 6y ago
    Krita is a painting app comparable to Corel Painter. You can't compare it with GIMP or Photoshop.
    • AntiImperialist 6y ago
      Doesn't matter. People have work to do with tools, not list out all the features. If Krita works for the person, there's no reason to use Gimp or Photoshop.
      • phkahler 6y ago
        That's a great observation. Maybe GIMP needs to focus on doing simple things in a simple way.
      • shawnz 6y ago
        If Krita works for the person it implies neither Gimp or Photoshop were exactly the right tool to begin with, since Krita is oriented towards a different set of tasks than Gimp/Photoshop
      • pessimizer 6y ago
        Whether it works for you isn't the criteria by which you should judge whether something is better or not. A hammer is also better than the GIMP at hammering a nail, but because I only need to hammer nails doesn't make the GIMP worse at what it does than a hammer. Krita is better for people who need to do a lot less than what the GIMP is capable of doing.
    • mkl 6y ago
      Yes you can. I've done a lot of photo editing in Krita. My cameras output 12-bit raw images, which for a long time GIMP could only work with by truncating to 8-bit. Krita has been able to work with higher bit depths for a long time. People do photo editing in Krita just like people do painting in Photoshop. Both tools can do both, as can GIMP, it's just that most of Krita's new features of the last few years have been focused on painting.
    • jcelerier 6y ago
      Krita is more than enough for a lot of photo editing needs, which are basically cropping, resizing, applying color filters etc - for those operations Krita is much more straightforward than GIMP. Also if what you said matched reality, Corel Painter would still exist in a meaningful way in 2020 but most artists migrated to Photoshop for their painting needs in 2007
      • 0x4a42 6y ago
        > Krita is more than enough for a lot of photo editing needs, which are basically cropping, resizing, applying color filters If it's your definition of photo editing then any freeware (ie: xnview, windows' image viewer...) can do this. You don't need Photoshop - which is pro high end software - to do this kind of basic stuffs.
        • jcelerier 6y ago
          I doubt xnview and windows' image viewer allow to correct the perspective but maybe I'm wrong ? I'd also be surprised if they allowed to change the white balance or do color curves - especially when you look at the amount of super powerful filters come with GMIC, which itself comes with Krita. They also most certainly don't have a "Repair" tool like Krita does (https://streamable.com/p5dd1k https://streamable.com/p5dd1k).
• klodolph 6y ago
  If you’re dead-set on using FOSS, why switch to the Mac in the first place? Wouldn’t you stick with Linux and use GIMP (or maybe Krita, which is usually a better alternative)? GIMP is not really a good image editor, when you compare it to the alternatives and include paid alternatives in the comparison. From my memory of using Photoshop, I’d say that GIMP is roughly equivalent to Photoshop 3.0, which came out in 1994, although it is missing some core features from Photoshop 3.0 (and prior versions—the workflows that I used in Photoshop 2.5 are unworkable in GIMP, as far as I can tell, and it’s extremely frustrating to try and use GIMP for basic tasks).