4 ms·
> Non-actionable warnings are meaningless. Agreed. Yet that’s exactly what they’re trying to make use of here. “The browser must not try to impersonate anothe
by andyroid 6y ago
> Non-actionable warnings are meaningless.
Agreed. Yet that’s exactly what they’re trying to make use of here.
“The browser must not try to impersonate another browser
like Chrome or Firefox.”
- disgruntledphd2 6y agoBut again, there's a double-bind here. Option 1: Remove UA spoofing, presumably Google will allow sign-in. However, Youtube and Gmail won't work. Option 2: Keep the UA spoofing, lose ability to sign in to Google. There's literally no way to comply. This is super, super anti-competitive, and I guess I'll have to figure out which MEP/Commission person I need to complain to (as they appear to be the only regulator likely to care).