4 ms·
If let's say that google charges 1$ (or more, adjust yourself) per gb of stored video, or 1$ per 20gb of bandwidth use to opt out of ads, will it be better?
by fendy3002 6y ago
If let's say that google charges 1$ (or more, adjust yourself) per gb of stored video, or 1$ per 20gb of bandwidth use to opt out of ads, will it be better?
- thirteenfingers 6y agoSpeaking for myself, I would be willing to pay YouTube to opt out of ads. I post mostly classical music videos, which are totally ruined if video advertisements are inserted in the middle. (Granted, YouTube doesn't seem to do that to classical music videos quite as much as it used to.) I'm already paying Vimeo for a low-budget data plan, and I only continue to use YouTube as my main platform because of the extra exposure.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- youcandothat 6y agoI would be willing to pay YouTube to opt out of ads But you can?
- zinekeller 6y agoNo, what he meant is that creators can pay YouTube/Google to not put ads on all of their videos for all of their audience, not YouTube Premium.
- 0-_-0 6y agoNo you can't, not as a creator, which is what GP was talking about.
- freebasenic 6y agonice name
- krageon 6y agoThey don't need to charge, they're making money hand over fist.