4 ms·
Hey thanks for the insightful comment! I'm sympathetic to your thought here on having an external service and going with a simple approach. Situations with a s
by jeremyis 6y ago
Hey thanks for the insightful comment! I'm sympathetic to your thought here on having an external service and going with a simple approach.
Situations with a slow deployment process has been a big motivator for building Config.ly -- and I've seen it happen at companies with medium-sized eng teams (taking hours to swap values during incident fires), and I know it's a problem _all_ iOS developers have due to the app store deploy process.
I also think there's other value here... For instance having a UI means non-technical folks can update it. A lot of my time as an engineer has been spent making copy tweaks (I've felt existing CMS products were too heavy-weight and difficult to plugin).
Also, having turn-key libraries mean you don't have to copy/paste hardcoded values among many clients (or store on the server build an API for _every_ constant). I'm a big fan of DRY.
- bawejakunal 6y agoBig +1 for making it easier for non engineering folks to update the copy strings via UI. This is something very useful for product teams at mid size companies
- jeremyis 6y agoThanks! Curious - why do you state mid sized companies specifically?
- bawejakunal 6y agoSome sort of dynamic config management existing via spring cloud or homegrown systems like configbus - easier to implement for larger tech companies, but the small and mid sized may benefit a lot f in their development speed from this off the shelf solution I believe as it evolves further
- jeremyis 6y agoGot it. thanks!