I didn't assume. I read the paper. I'm being equivocal in my wording, because that's what you do when you're being polite, and you're giving the authors the be

I didn't assume. I read the paper. I'm being equivocal in my wording, because that's what you do when you're being polite, and you're giving the authors the benefit of the doubt. Maybe I missed something, but I didn't see them control for this in a way that satisfies me that the issue was addressed. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(20)30462-4/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0...